- #NOISE REDUCTION IN LIGHTROOM 5.2 HOW TO#
- #NOISE REDUCTION IN LIGHTROOM 5.2 UPGRADE#
- #NOISE REDUCTION IN LIGHTROOM 5.2 PC#
- #NOISE REDUCTION IN LIGHTROOM 5.2 PLUS#
- #NOISE REDUCTION IN LIGHTROOM 5.2 FREE#
(conclusion some practise in controlling the sliders in HQ and Prime does help. (default luminance 40 in prime and Define2 (also in " automode" when exporting a tiff vs 80+ luminance prime directly jpeg is around the same.
#NOISE REDUCTION IN LIGHTROOM 5.2 PLUS#
(Didn’t used much of the sliders and started testing Silkypix plus Dfine2 against Primenoise.) Then i started to read in about the control sliders. And a DNG of DxO op10? into second raw converter wasn’t really “great” in noise reduction, so i used Define2 to smooth the noise further.
#NOISE REDUCTION IN LIGHTROOM 5.2 FREE#
Interesting, i was playing with essential free version before i bought the elite and i found the HQFast (only option) in default mode/setting not the greatest compared with my other raw converter (Silkypix) in defaultsetting. HQ Fast is much better than C1 noise reduction and somewhat better than Lightroom noise reduction If a photographer needs to preview an image with noise suppressed HQ Fast is good enough and it’s even good enough for production (certain images look better).
#NOISE REDUCTION IN LIGHTROOM 5.2 UPGRADE#
I haven’t just substituted and tested as it would require an OS upgrade to do so.
#NOISE REDUCTION IN LIGHTROOM 5.2 HOW TO#
HQ Fast is much better than C1 noise reduction and somewhat better than Lightroom noise reduction.Ĭould you explain how and where GPU acceleration affects performance for Windows and Mac to help Mike, John and I decide how to configure our machines please? I do have another Radeon RX580 with which I could replace my GTX 980 if it would make a big difference in performance. For other users coming across this thread, really, really Prime Noise should only be switched on at the very end of changes. I will hide the Noise Panel as well as not enable it to the very end.
That’s really good information for PhotoLab users and much appreciated.
For exporting a single image (or a very small number of images), clock speed is most important, for exporting many images, cores are more important. If PRIME matters to you, choose a high clock speed and many cores. PRIME’s speed (during export and for the magnifier in the Noise Reduction palette) mainly depends on the CPU.
#NOISE REDUCTION IN LIGHTROOM 5.2 PC#
On my PC (i7-6700K 4GHz), exporting three images from the 5DS with PRIME enabled took 4 min 20 sec in total, which seems plausible given the huge number of pixels.Ĭollapsing or hiding the Noise Reduction palette might speed up the interface a very little bit. Desktop CPUs are generally faster than mobile CPUs, even if both are labelled “i5” or “i7”. Collapsing or hiding the Noise Reduction palette might speed up the interface a very little bit. In turn, enabling it or not should have no impact on the lag between changing a cursor value and seing the updated image in the main Preview window, neither for local nor for global adjustments. You cannot see its effect in the main Preview window. Still, I can recall some bits of information about PRIME:īecause of its slowness, PRIME is only applied during image export and for the magnifier in the Noise Reduction palette. We are constantly researching ways to accelerate it (long-term users might recall that it was way slower when introduced back in the days of OpticsPro 9), but it’s not easy, and I acknowledge that we’re not satisfied yet. Generally speaking, we know that PRIME is slow. Its a bit of a pain if I go back to them as they are then much slower to load again, but if I expect that I just select them again and remove PRIME! PRIME I just rate images that needed it and select them at the end and add PRIME to them.
I suspect the problem is the relevant programming was done at a time of smaller files and lower screen output was the normįor me the largest pain is the slow lag when using local adjustments, its faster to close the local adjustments and see what the result is and then reopen and make further changes if needed. He did some on my laptop and found PL good but far to slow for this and I am sure many others will be in the same position).
He does a basic processing on them (mostly low light so uses RAW) and then runs it on them all. Many users I know will have many more and it must be off putting to have such a slow processing (my son does event photography so may have into the 1000 plus images. Its not a major problem, just slow with large files, what concerns me is I only do a few images at a time, 10-20 at most. Mostly running on Intel® HD Graphics 4600 with NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M My set up is i7-4900MQ CPU 2.80GHz 16 GB memory
0 kommentar(er)
